<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: iPhone: Cisco vs Apple</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gadgetlounge.net/mobile-phone/iphone-cisco-vs-apple/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gadgetlounge.net/mobile-phone/iphone-cisco-vs-apple/</link>
	<description>Digital Technology for Digital Living.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Jan 2011 10:18:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: bern</title>
		<link>http://www.gadgetlounge.net/mobile-phone/iphone-cisco-vs-apple/comment-page-1/#comment-8582</link>
		<dc:creator>bern</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jan 2007 15:31:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gadgetlounge.net/archives/2007/01/12/iphone-cisco-vs-apple/#comment-8582</guid>
		<description>Apple&#039;s arrogance surprises me.  It&#039;s one thing for them not to want to enter the kind of agreement Cisco seeks.  But for Apple to pursue to release the product with full knowledge that they don&#039;t own the trademark is wild.  THey changed the set-top box name from iTV to Apple TV simply because they don&#039;t own iTV.  Then again iTV sucks and the iPhone is better.  The ironic thing is it&#039;s called iPhone yet the &#039;phone&#039; is the product&#039;s weak feature: they chose Cingular as the carrier.  They might as well have used T-Mobile.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apple&#8217;s arrogance surprises me.  It&#8217;s one thing for them not to want to enter the kind of agreement Cisco seeks.  But for Apple to pursue to release the product with full knowledge that they don&#8217;t own the trademark is wild.  THey changed the set-top box name from iTV to Apple TV simply because they don&#8217;t own iTV.  Then again iTV sucks and the iPhone is better.  The ironic thing is it&#8217;s called iPhone yet the &#8216;phone&#8217; is the product&#8217;s weak feature: they chose Cingular as the carrier.  They might as well have used T-Mobile.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced)

Served from: www.gadgetlounge.net @ 2012-02-11 10:41:27 -->
